![]() |
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
SPECIAL TOPICS
|
THREE-YEAR-OLDS & UPHowever
the rumor began that three-year-olds can't beat their elders, the cost
to the American horseplayer has been irreparable. In
fact, three-year-olds can beat older horses, and sometimes should be
expected to, depending upon the conditions of eligibility. Or depending
upon the kinds of races at hand. If
maidens of summer, 3up, will run, do handicappers prefer a four-year-old
that has never won a race? How about a five-year-old? I think not. Time
of the season is also pertinent. Studies of the running times of races
limited to three-year-olds reveal the typical times (pars) are slower
by lengths than the typical times of older horses of comparable class,
but the differences decrease as the season progresses. In
sprints, three-year-olds are slower by three fifths on January 1, by
two fifths on April 15, and by one fifth on July 1. Not until November
1 do time differences disappear entirely. At
1 1/16 miles, three-year-olds are slower by seven fifths on January
1, by a second on April 15, and by three fifths on July 1. Come November
1, three-year-olds at the route are still slower, by one fifth of a
second, approximately a length. These
findings apply rigorously to claiming races. The inference that three-year-old
claiming horses cannot challenge their elders successfully in spring,
summer, and early fall is largely correct, notably at the route. So the matter of three-year-olds & up is a mixed bag. The crucial variables are eligibility conditions and time of the season. Handicappers need to know in what kinds of races three-year-olds stand a greater or lesser chance. |
|
|||||
| Copyright ©2002 by Information Superbrand, Inc. All rights reserved. |
|||||||